»
S
I
D
E
B
A
R
«
Structure: 1: The Syd Field Question
Apr 30th, 2010 by paul peditto

“I never get to . . . the index cards. I’ve never done that. I should, probably. I start with theme and character and, sometimes, ideas for scenes and dialogue, and I get a sense thematically of what I want to explore and accomplish. Basically I’m too immature to actually work it all out in my head before I start for some reason. So I actually start and just let the screenplay sort of guide me as to where it’s going. Sometimes I hit walls, and then I go back and I start from the beginning, because I always find that wall has been built because something hasn’t been seeded correctly, something hasn’t been developed. . . . I also find that by approaching writing that way as opposed to outlining, you come up with incredibly original work, because you’re not using formulas and you’re not mapping out plot lines that can’t help but be sourced from a million movies you’ve seen.”

–Richard LaGravenese

“Although knowledge of structure is helpful, real creativity comes from leaps of faith in which you jump to something illogical. But those leaps form the memorable moments in movies.”

Francis Ford Coppola

THE SYD FIELD QUESTION:

Let’s talk about the original Script God…Syd Field.

Syd the Empire, the mindset.

Syd, God Of Structure.

With his book Screenplay, and the ensuing books—how many does he have now?—he has built a dynasty updating Greek 3-act structure, adapting it for the world of screenplays. Old School as Greece itself, he calls this invention: The Paradigm.

It involves a “card” system whereby each scene is put on a 3 X 5 index card. Scenes are examined for necessity. Essential scenes are kept, non-essential scenes tossed. This is also called outlining.

You will need to make a choice about outlining. This is a process choice. Syd would have you believe there is no choice: You must outline.  You must know the ending to your movie before you begin.

Let me repeat that. In the World According To Syd, you must know the ending of your movie before you begin.

This is 100%, fat-free, BS.

You’d never know it, but I began with the Syd Field method. Most of my screenplays were written after outlining every scene on 3 X 5 index cards. I would lay them out on the table, and then spend a day or two pouring over them. Today with Final Draft, the outlining process is simpler. The software creates “cards” for you (when you type in a slugline, it creates a “card.” All you need do (for Final Draft) is go to Scene Navigator. You’ll get a page that looks like this:

FINAL DRAFT CARDS

Let’s be clear: I don’t have a problem with Syd as Cottage Industry. The problem is his inflexibility. His system dictates that there is only one way to write a movie. And that, Good Reader, is loco.

You think Fellini worried about Plot Points? Did Altman—Cassavetes—Wells—Coppola—Kurosawa agonize over hitting marks in 3-act structure?

“Inciting Incident, Plot Point 1, Midpoint, Plot Point 2”…

The “45 & 75 page complication”…

The “Awakening” and “Call To Action”, the “Push To The Breaking Point” and “Fall From Grace” and “Transformational Moment”…

So many systems, so little time. Doesn’t your head swim with these systems? It should. This is just Script Gods selling books.

Am I saying forget about page count? Hand in however many pages it takes to speak you mind?  Absolutely not. A novel can be 300 pages or 600 pages. A screenplay cannot. Hand in a 150 page spec (speculation) script and the powers-that-be will weigh it, check the back page, see it’s 150 pages, and likely put it with the other paperweights, right in the recycle bin.

Structure is important. But over-conceptualization isn’t needed. Just common sense.Don’t be paralyzed by structural systems. Don’t over-think this stuff!

Tell a great story that producers will buy and people will want to see.

Format: 12: Miscellaneous Stuff
Apr 22nd, 2010 by paul peditto

PARENTHETICALS

I am a parenthetical hater. Known as “wrylys,” these are line readings for the actors.

Let me ask you a common-sense question: Do you really believe an actress is going to remember that on page 66, in the middle of the line “the calla lilies are in bloom,” she will remember to sigh and smile and gaze longingly at the sea—because the screenwriter demands it?

I would ask you—no, I beg you—anytime you feel the urge to use:

(Smiling)

(Sighing)

(Laughing)

(Sarcastically)

(Looking right/left)

(Motioning with a hand/lip/chin)

(Whispering)

(Screaming)

Don’t do it. Just…don’t.

BILL

(screaming)

GET OUT!!!!

Bill must be really upset. You threw in the screaming parenthetical (not to mention the capped dialogue and four exclamation points!!!!)  Good Reader, this is overkill.

Is there a time you need a parenthetical? Sure…

—Direct address to a character:  (“to Larry”)

—If needed by the story:

Colonel Mustard drags Miss Scarlett into the Conservatory.

COLONEL MUSTARD

(pulls out a wrench)

And now, my dear...

Gotta have “pulls out a wrench.” Ain’t no scene without it. Same general rule as ever: If I need it for story, it stays. If not, it goes.

MUSIC:

Generally, don’t write specific songs into the script unless you’re paying for it. If you want Muddy Waters “I’m A Man,” write BLUES MUSIC. The rule is: You pay the Piper, you pick the tune.

But wait a minute, what about Almost Famous?:

Up ahead, the door to their smallish hotel room is open.

Inside, a band party in full swing.  A clunky early-model boom box segues from James Brown’s “Make It Funky” to Led Zeppelin’s “Gallows Pole.”   Russell Hammond is the center of this party, jabbing out the chords, playing along on guitar.  Much singing echoes all around.

Cameron Crowe can afford to pay Led Zeppelin. Can you? And how could you make a movie about music like Almost Famous without musical references?

How about one from a non-music movie, Pet Cemetery:

The garden is a plot of about half an acre. JUD comes trundling slowly along a row, pushing a wheelbarrow. There are several pumpkins in it.

JUD is wearing old khaki gardening pants and a Ramones sweatshirt. He’s wearing his headphones and we can hear the Romantics doing “What I Like About You.” JUD is singing along and bopping a little--as much as his arthritis will allow, if you can dig it.

No, I can’t dig it. Why oh why do I need the Romantics? Because it establishes character? The Ramones t-shirt says it all. Unless story is influenced by bad New Wave music and you need it as set up, leave it out. The general guideline applies: Don’t put the specific songs in screen direction unless absolutely necessary.

CREDIT SEQUENCES:

I don’t specify them. Yes, I’ve read dozens of scripts that do. If you can justify the need for the reader to know where your Credit Sequence rolls, then be my guest and add it. For a spec script, I wouldn’t bother.

FOREIGN LANGUAGES:

If you want to mix Spanish words with English, sprinkle it in, but just a sprinkle. You need to communicate. What if the reader doesn’t speak Spanish? You can explain it, as in the movie Spanglish:

...the mother leans down, gives three quick kisses--power pecks, to the girl’s cheeks, and then an admonition in Spanish:

MOTHER

Una lagrima...sola una sola...haz la major possible.

NARRATOR

“One tear...only one...so make it a good one.”

This was my mother’s instruction to me.

Or, you can put it entirely in the screen direction, as in The Godfather:

SOLLOZZO

I am going to talk Italian to Mike.

MCCLUSKEY

Sure, you two go right ahead; I’ll concentrate on my veal and my spaghetti.

SOLLOZZO now begins in rapid Sicilian.  MICHAEL listening carefully and nodding every so often.  Then MICHAEL answers in Sicilian, and SOLLOZZO goes on.  The WAITER occasionally brings food; and they hesitate while he is there; then go on.

Then MICHAEL, having difficulty expressing himself in Italian, accidentally lapses into English.

MICHAEL

(using English for emphasis)

Most important...I want a sure guarantee that no more attempts will be made on my father’s life.

Safest bet: Subtitle it in your screen direction once, clearly seen: “Mandarin, with English subtitles.” Then roll the dialogue in English. Here’s how, from Pearl Harbor:

The last man to enter the room and take his place is ADMIRAL YAMAMOTO.  Harvard educated, Yamamoto is an object of veneration and suspicion among the men of the war council. Yamamoto bows, sits, and looks across the table at his friend Genda, who can’t hide his fear.

Yamamoto glances to the far end of the table where NISHIKURA, chief of the War Council, sits glowering. Their discussion is in Japanese, with subtitles.

NISHIKUR

So you join us, Admiral.  Some of us thought your education at an American university would make you too weak to fight the Americans.

YAMAMOTO

If knowledge of opponents and careful calculation of danger is taken as weakness then I have misunderstood what it means to be Japanese.

NISHIKURA

The time has come to strike!

Or, as in this example from 15 MINUTES:

OLEG RAZGUL, stands in line behind Emil.  Oleg is big.  Not tall – but wide.  A wrestler’s body.  Emil looks at Oleg. The following is in CZECH and subtitled in ENGLISH.

EMIL

Don’t fool around.

OLEG

Okay.

Biz: 2: The Playwright as Screenwriter
Apr 16th, 2010 by paul peditto

“I was so mad at my agent. I had polished and polished and polished… and he referred to it as a draft. I wrote him a bitter letter: ‘How can you call this a draft? I don’t do drafts”–Cynthia Ozick

“Movie makers buy plays because it makes them feel smart. Acquiring a play that has been well received makes them feel incredibly worldly. But the irony is that plays are about words, and here in L.A., they like to make movies about lava flowing down Wilshire Boulevard. A play reveals itself through dialogue. In a movie, the dialogue is likely to be, ‘O.K., shoot him.’”–Anonymous Hollywood Executive

“(Rewriting is) a whole other art form; it’s about craftsmanship.”–Sam Shepard

Transition is hard for playwrights. As the playwright, you are God. If they come at you in theater, they come hat in hand: “Excuse me esteemed Mr. Playwright, is it all right if, on page 88, we change the and to but?”

A bit further down the priority pyramid from God-head stands the screenwriter. There are volumes dedicated to the poor treatment of this delicate creature. I’ll not add to these. I will simply point out that, if Sam Shepard, one of the great playwrights of our lifetime, had to rewrite in service of others—so will you.

Plays are all about words. Film is visual, then verbal. As a playwright, I felt this odd transition myself. To be fair, one reason Jane Doe went into the toilet was my insistence on using the same Voice Over that appeared in the play. This forced additional scenes to be shot when they weren’t necessary. Another reason was our faulty production schedule. More often than not we wouldn’t “make our day”—meaning we couldn’t shoot all the scenes scheduled. Meaning scenes were cut for no reason other than we didn’t have time to shoot them. Meaning the story no longer made sense. Meaning writing under the gun because, without scene B, you have to build a bridge from scene A to C for the story to make sense. And you have to do it in 37 minutes because the crew is ready for the next shot and hey, time time time is money!

How many times did Coppola rewrite Apocalypse Now? Julius Epstein had no idea how to end Casablanca until the last minute (“Round up the usual suspects.”) Cassavetes improvised entire movies. Soffia Coppola won the Best Original Screenplay Oscar thanks, in large part, to Bill Murray improvisations. Read screenplays and you’ll recognize, very often, what’s on the page isn’t what makes it to the screen. Spec screenplays are considered skeletons, blueprints, early-stage instruments, not a verbatim, nightly performed and not to be fucked with work of art—a.k.a, a play.

Format: New Spec, Page Awards Style
Apr 7th, 2010 by paul peditto

Been reading about this new Page Awards spec-formatting style. If you haven’t seen it, you can look here for full guidelines.

Sluglines, according to this new style, can be in bold and underlined:

INT. OFFICE- DAY

The Unknown Screenwriter staggers in, coffee cup in hand, caffeine buzz not yet taken hold, looking toward…

THE COMPUTER

His screenplay beckons, blinking curser, empty page…

UNKNOWN SCREENWRITER

Blinks, turns tail, gets the hell out of there.

You can also bold/underline technical terms like MONTAGE or SUPER and italicize something the audience will see, for instance:

SUPERDANGER, LIQUID EXPLOSIVE, FLAMMABLE, CLEAR THE AREA, STUPID!

If it’s about formatting, whatever Dave Trottier says is pretty much gospel with me. The guy doesn’t miss very often when it comes to common sense about screenwriting format.

Though, honestly, all these new-fangled flourishes are just lipstick on a pig if your story and characters aren’t there. Which is why folks should never lose sight of the big picture…

“This ain’t no party, this ain’t no disco,              
this ain’t no fooling around
No time for dancing, or lovey dovey,
I ain’t got time for that now…”

–Talking Heads

The WGA registers 50,000+ scripts a year. The MPAA’s “US Theatrical Market Statistics report” cited 603 movies released into theaters in 2007.  That left 49,000+ scripts in the pipeline. Come 2008, another 50,000+ were registered, say another 600 made. Now you had 98,000+ bastard children from just those two years alone. Then comes 2009′s children, and 2010′s…all those unwanted and unloved kids! It’s all so sad…

I mention the harsh realities not to drag you down. Just the opposite. It’s meant to wake you up to the reality of how good your script needs to be, not to mention how much plain-‘ol Vegas luck is part of this deal.

Don’t get sidetracked with small stuff like trendy format changes. Nail your script down tight as humanly possible. Get it into the hands of someone who is not just responsive to your genre and writing, but who also brings enough power to bear to make something happen. The factors of timing and luck cannot be easily quantified, nor ignored.

Put the exact script in the exact hands, bringing power to bear at an exact moment.


 

»  Customization and Development: Local Galaxy Web Development   »  Substance: WordPress   »  Style: Ahren Ahimsa